WeWork: When Things Didn’t Work Out Well

Startups have always been the darlings of the business world—promising innovation, disruption, and the occasional fairy-tale success story. Among these, co-working spaces emerged as a niche that turned into a booming industry, especially in the aftermath of COVID. As remote work gained momentum, the traditional office lost its charm, and professionals began seeking modern, flexible spaces that fostered creativity, collaboration, and community.

Enter WeWork, the pioneer that didn’t just offer shared workspaces—it sold a dream. With sleek designs, buzzing hubs, and a culture that blended Silicon Valley's energy with urban sophistication, WeWork wasn’t just renting desks; it was reshaping how we thought about workspaces.

But what started as a brilliant vision soon spiraled into a cautionary tale of ambition unchecked by reality. At its peak, WeWork was valued at a jaw-dropping $47 billion. Yet, within months, its empire crumbled, its charismatic CEO was ousted, and its valuation plummeted to a fraction of its former glory.

So, how did a company with so much promise stumble so spectacularly? What lessons can we learn from its meteoric rise and devastating fall? Let’s dive into the story of WeWork—an inspiring vision that fell victim to its own excesses.

There’s a reason 400,000 professionals read this daily.

Join The AI Report, trusted by 400,000+ professionals at Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. Get daily insights, tools, and strategies to master practical AI skills that drive results.

Sign up now for free and work smarter, not harder.

Beginnings: Redefining Workspaces

In 2010, Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey set out to transform how people work. They founded WeWork in New York City, turning unused office spaces into vibrant hubs designed for freelancers, startups, and entrepreneurs.Neumann’s bold vision, combined with McKelvey’s architectural expertise, created more than just co-working spaces—they built communities. Sleek interiors, free coffee, fast Wi-Fi, and a focus on collaboration became WeWork’s trademarks, appealing to a generation seeking more than traditional cubicles.

Investors, led by SoftBank, poured billions into the venture. In less than a decade, WeWork scaled from a single location to over 30 countries, reaching a valuation of $47 billion. The brand promised to redefine work as a lifestyle, where innovation thrived, and passion met productivity.

The Growth Story

WeWork’s journey from 2010 to 2019 was a whirlwind of rapid expansion, innovation, and sky-high valuations:

• 2010: WeWork opened its first location in SoHo, New York City, transforming an ordinary office space into a vibrant co-working hub. The idea was simple yet groundbreaking—offer flexible, collaborative workspaces for freelancers and small businesses, combining utility with a sense of community.

• 2014: After expanding to 10 U.S. cities, WeWork achieved a valuation of $1.5 billion, cementing its reputation as a promising startup. The rapid growth was fueled by demand from startups and entrepreneurs looking for affordable, short-term office solutions with premium amenities.

• 2015: WeWork went international, launching its first locations in London and Tel Aviv. This marked the beginning of a global expansion strategy, aiming to make the WeWork experience a worldwide phenomenon. The company started branding itself not just as a real estate provider but as a lifestyle choice for modern professionals.

• 2018: At its peak, WeWork reached a valuation of $47 billion, becoming one of the most valuable private companies in the world. With over 500 locations across 30+ countries, it catered to a wide audience—from small businesses to Fortune 500 companies. WeWork wasn't just a co-working space anymore; it was seen as a global network redefining how people approached work.

• 2019: The much-anticipated IPO filing brought WeWork's internal struggles to light. Questionable leadership decisions, financial mismanagement, and a flawed business model cast doubt on the company’s sustainability. The cracks that had been forming beneath the surface became impossible to ignore.

WeWork’s meteoric rise told a story of innovation and ambition. However, the challenges it faced underscored the pitfalls of unchecked growth and leadership overreach.

The Fall: Where Did Things Go Wrong?

• Branding as a Tech Company: WeWork branded itself as a tech company, not a real estate firm, to attract attention from venture capitalists and investors seeking disruptive innovations. By marketing its services as a blend of technology and community-driven workspace solutions, it secured massive funding, including billions from SoftBank. However, its business model relied on a traditional approach—signing long-term leases on prime properties and subleasing them as short-term rentals to startups and freelancers. While this strategy worked in a booming market, it made WeWork highly vulnerable to economic downturns and occupancy risks, as the company bore the fixed costs of leases regardless of revenue fluctuations.

• Diversification Gone Wrong: Fueled by its early success, WeWork aggressively expanded into ventures far removed from its core co-working business. WeLive, a co-living initiative, aimed to revolutionize urban living but struggled to gain traction. Similarly, WeGrow, an education venture spearheaded by Adam Neumann’s wife, was ambitious but lacked a scalable vision and profitability. These ventures demanded significant investment without delivering meaningful returns, creating financial strain and diluting WeWork’s focus. Instead of perfecting its profitable operations, the company spread itself too thin across unrelated projects.

• Leadership and Governance Issues: At the heart of WeWork's story was Adam Neumann, the charismatic yet controversial CEO. Neumann’s bold vision and ability to sell a dream captivated investors, but his questionable decision-making and unchecked authority led to major governance flaws. He was accused of conflicts of interest, such as buying properties and leasing them back to WeWork, and his extravagant spending on private jets, lavish parties, and personal luxuries painted a picture of recklessness. Neumann’s leadership style, combined with a lack of accountability, shook investor confidence and highlighted the dangers of excessive reliance on a single figure.

• The Failed IPO: In 2019, WeWork planned to go public in what was expected to be one of the year’s most significant IPOs. However, its IPO filings exposed alarming details: unsustainable financial losses, a shaky business model, and governance issues. WeWork had reported $1.6 billion in losses the prior year despite boasting a valuation of $47 billion. The filings revealed Neumann’s extensive control and personal conflicts of interest, further tarnishing the company’s reputation. Investor enthusiasm evaporated, and within weeks, the valuation plummeted to below $10 billion, forcing WeWork to withdraw its IPO and rethink its strategy.

• Restructuring and Aftermath: After the IPO collapse, WeWork faced a financial and operational crisis. SoftBank, its largest backer, intervened with a $9.5 billion bailout, gaining significant control of the company. Adam Neumann stepped down as CEO, walking away with a controversial $1.7 billion severance package, while WeWork laid off thousands of employees to cut costs. Expansion plans were shelved, and the company refocused on its core co-working business. These restructuring efforts helped stabilize the company, but the damage to its reputation and the workforce was immense, leaving WeWork as a cautionary tale of unchecked ambition and flawed execution.

WeWork Today?

As of 2025, WeWork has evolved into a leaner, more focused version of its former self. After the fallout from its failed IPO and leadership overhaul, the company went public through a SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) merger in 2021, valuing it at a fraction of its previous $47 billion peak valuation. The merger provided the much-needed capital injection and gave the company an opportunity to rebuild its image and stabilize its operations.

Under its revamped leadership, WeWork shifted its focus to cost efficiency and optimizing its core co-working business. The company scaled back its aggressive expansion plans, shedding underperforming assets and prioritizing profitability over growth. In its hybrid work model offerings, WeWork has tailored its services to meet the changing needs of businesses in a post-pandemic world, offering flexible workspaces for companies seeking alternatives to long-term office leases.

The Indian Context

India has emerged as one of WeWork’s most promising markets. With its booming startup ecosystem, increasing acceptance of co-working spaces, and rising demand for flexible office solutions, WeWork India has managed to carve out a significant market share. The Indian arm operates under a franchise model in partnership with Embassy Group, a leading real estate player in the country.

WeWork India adopted a strategy that aligns with the unique challenges and opportunities of the Indian market:

1. Affordable Plans: Recognizing the price sensitivity of Indian businesses, WeWork India offers competitive pricing structures for startups, small businesses, and even larger corporations.

2. Diverse Locations: With operations across major cities like Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Delhi-NCR, WeWork India caters to the needs of entrepreneurs and enterprises in the country’s key business hubs.

3. Hybrid Work Adoption: Post-pandemic, the demand for hybrid workspaces in India surged. Many companies, especially multinationals, opted for satellite offices in WeWork locations to reduce costs while maintaining flexibility.

WeWork India has also partnered with global tech companies and local unicorn startups to create tailored office spaces, making it a preferred choice in the competitive Indian co-working sector. As of 2025, the Indian arm has seen consistent occupancy rates and continues to be one of the few profitable regions for WeWork globally.

Conclusion

While WeWork has survived its turbulent past, its story remains a powerful reminder of the perils of overvalued ambitions, mismanagement, and unsustainable growth. The company’s ability to adapt to the hybrid work revolution and its success in cost-cutting measures have provided a lifeline, but challenges persist. India’s fast-growing economy and entrepreneurial spirit represent a critical growth opportunity for WeWork, but sustaining this requires disciplined execution, a localized approach, and a focus on delivering consistent value.

In hindsight, WeWork’s journey underscores a simple yet powerful lesson: Growth is good, but sustainable growth is better.

Lessons Learned

Like every other story, this one too provides important and valuable business lessons. Some of these are as follows:

1. Focus on Core Strengths: WeWork's attempt to diversify into ventures like education and housing significantly distracted it from its core business of providing co-working spaces. This overextension not only drained resources but also confused its market positioning. Businesses should concentrate on excelling in their primary offerings, building a solid foundation before venturing into unrelated areas.

2. Sustainable Growth: WeWork's rapid expansion across multiple cities and countries, without fully analyzing market demand, created operational inefficiencies and financial instability. Leasing premium spaces with high overheads led to significant losses. Sustainable growth means expanding cautiously, driven by real market demand.

3. Transparency and Governance: The lack of proper checks on leadership decisions at WeWork resulted in a chaotic culture and poor financial management. Strong governance ensures accountability, especially during periods of rapid growth.

4. Realistic Valuation: WeWork’s valuation of $47 billion was based on lofty expectations rather than actual financial performance, causing investor disillusionment when those expectations weren’t met. Aligning valuations with tangible results builds credibility and prevents reputational damage.

About the Writer: Janakiraman S is a passionate business enthusiast with a knack for storytelling. Hailing from Chennai, he completed his schooling at The School KFI and earned his undergraduate degree from SRM Institute of Science and Technology. Currently pursuing an MBA in International Business at T. A. Pai Management Institute (TAPMI), Janakiraman is focused on broadening his horizons and setting ambitious goals for the future.

This brings us to the end of yet another great story of a business that grew at a break neck speed only to fall down miserably because it did not focus on basics. I hope you enjoyed reading it. If you did, consider sharing it within your circle. For more interesting case studies, remain tuned. If you haven’t subscribed to my newsletter, I highly encourage you to do so.

Check out my other stories here:

• Ryanair: The ethos of cost efficiency

• Pulse: How a Tangy Twist Redefined India's Candy Landscape

• Ather Energy: The Road to Electrifying India

Keep tuned for more such case studies.
Until then,
Happy Reading!